Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
Prager, Eric M; Chambers, Karen E; Plotkin, Joshua L; McArthur, David L; Bandrowski, Anita E; Bansal, Nidhi; Martone, Maryann E; Bergstrom, Hadley C; Bespalov, Anton; Graf, Chris.
Afiliación
  • Prager EM; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Chambers KE; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Plotkin JL; Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • McArthur DL; Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Bandrowski AE; Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California.
  • Bansal N; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Martone ME; Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California.
  • Bergstrom HC; Department of Psychological Science, Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York.
  • Bespalov A; Partnership for Assessment and Accreditation of Scientific Practice, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Graf C; Valdman Institute of Pharmacology, Pavlov First State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
J Neurosci Res ; 97(4): 377-390, 2019 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30506706
Progress in basic and clinical research is slowed when researchers fail to provide a complete and accurate report of how a study was designed, executed, and the results analyzed. Publishing rigorous scientific research involves a full description of the methods, materials, procedures, and outcomes. Investigators may fail to provide a complete description of how their study was designed and executed because they may not know how to accurately report the information or the mechanisms are not in place to facilitate transparent reporting. Here, we provide an overview of how authors can write manuscripts in a transparent and thorough manner. We introduce a set of reporting criteria that can be used for publishing, including recommendations on reporting the experimental design and statistical approaches. We also discuss how to accurately visualize the results and provide recommendations for peer reviewers to enhance rigor and transparency. Incorporating transparency practices into research manuscripts will significantly improve the reproducibility of the results by independent laboratories.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Edición / Investigación Biomédica Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Res Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Edición / Investigación Biomédica Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Res Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos