Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measurements of ultrasonic deterrents and an acoustically branded hairdryer: Ambiguities in guideline compliance.
Dolder, Craig N; Fletcher, Mark D; Lloyd Jones, Sian; Lineton, Benjamin; Dennison, Sarah R; Symmonds, Michael; White, Paul R; Leighton, Timothy G.
Afiliación
  • Dolder CN; Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
  • Fletcher MD; Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
  • Lloyd Jones S; Department of Audiology and Hearing Therapy, Royal South Hants Hospital, Brinton's Terrace, Southampton SO14 0YG, United Kingdom.
  • Lineton B; Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
  • Dennison SR; Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
  • Symmonds M; Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
  • White PR; Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
  • Leighton TG; Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 144(4): 2565, 2018 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30404457
Acoustic radiation from three commercial pest deterrents and two hair dryers were measured in an anechoic chamber. The deterrents were chosen because the frequency range at which they emit the most energy is either in the very high-frequency sound band (11.2-17.8 kHz) or the ultrasound band (greater than 17.8 kHz). These are sources that may be heard by a subset of the general population, with the young typically having better high frequency sensitivity. A hairdryer reported to increase the frequency of the motor noise above the audible hearing range was compared with a standard hairdryer. The outputs of the deterrents are compared against six international regulations and guidelines for audible and ultrasound exposure. Multiple ambiguities in the application of these guidelines are discussed. These ambiguities could lead to a device being considered as in compliance despite unconventionally high levels. Even if a device measured here meets a guideline, actual exposures can exceed those taken here and may therefore breach guidelines if the listener is closer to the device or reflections increase the exposure level.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Acoust Soc Am Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Acoust Soc Am Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos