Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of diagnosis of COPD and factors associated with misdiagnosis in primary care setting. E-DIAL (Early DIAgnosis of obstructive lung disease) study group.
Nardini, Stefano; Annesi-Maesano, Isabella; Simoni, Marzia; Ponte, Adriana Del; Sanguinetti, Claudio Maria; De Benedetto, Fernando.
Afiliación
  • Nardini S; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Vittorio Veneto, Italy.
  • Annesi-Maesano I; Epidemiology of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases Department (EPAR), Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Saint-Antoine Medical School, Paris, France. Electronic address: isabella.annesi-maesano@inserm.fr.
  • Simoni M; Epidemiology of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases Department (EPAR), Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Saint-Antoine Medical School, Paris, France.
  • Ponte AD; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Chieti Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
  • Sanguinetti CM; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Santo Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • De Benedetto F; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Chieti Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
Respir Med ; 143: 61-66, 2018 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30261994
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and results in both substantial and increasing socioeconomic burden. Guidelines on COPD encourage primary care physicians to detect the disease at an early stage. Our main aim was to evaluate the accuracy of the diagnosis of COPD at the primary health care. METHODS: 6466 patients were randomly selected in 22 Italian primary care practices (46% males, mean age 56 ±â€¯16 years) and were asked about respiratory symptoms and risk for any chronic respiratory disease including COPD. After a prior evaluation, 701 patients (51% males, mean age 59 ±â€¯15 years) were sent by General Practitioners (GPs) to Pulmonary Units (PU) for confirming the diagnosis. The agreement in diagnosing COPD between GPs and pulmonary diseases specialists was assessed by using Cohen's kappa (k) statistic. RESULTS: Lack of precision in COPD diagnosis resulted in 13% of over-diagnosis and 59% of under-diagnosis. GPs were quite good in correctly excluding the patients who did not have COPD (specificity = 87%), but less good in diagnosing the patients with COPD (sensitivity = 41%). The risk of under-diagnosis was higher in people with age >62 years and in current/ex-smokers, when compared to no COPD, whereas it was higher in subject <62 years old and in those with no previous spirometry when compared to correctly diagnosed COPD. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that COPD misdiagnosis is common in primary care and that under-diagnosis is a major problem. It is necessary to enhance COPD diagnosis and to reduce misdiagnosis in primary care settings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Errores Diagnósticos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Errores Diagnósticos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Respir Med Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido