12-Month Cost Outcomes of Community Engagement Versus Technical Assistance for Depression Quality Improvement: A Partnered, Cluster Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
Ethn Dis
; 28(Suppl 2): 349-356, 2018.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30202187
Objective: To compare community engagement and planning (CEP) for coalition support to implement depression quality improvement (QI) to resources for services (RS) effects on service-use costs over a 12-month period. Design: Matched health and community programs (N=93) were cluster-randomized within communities to CEP or RS. Setting: Two Los Angeles communities. Participants: Adults (N=1,013) with depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) ≥10); 85% African American and Latino. Interventions: CEP and RS to support programs in depression QI. Main Outcome Measures: Intervention training and service-use costs over 12 months. Results: CEP planning and training costs were almost 3 times higher than RS, largely due to greater CEP provider training participation vs RS, with no significant differences in 12-month service-use costs. Conclusions: Compared with RS, CEP had higher planning and training costs with similar service-use costs.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Asistencia Técnica a la Planificación en Salud
/
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental
/
Participación de la Comunidad
/
Depresión
/
Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Health_economic_evaluation
Límite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Región como asunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Ethn Dis
Asunto de la revista:
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
/
SAUDE PUBLICA
Año:
2018
Tipo del documento:
Article
Pais de publicación:
Estados Unidos