Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole-nesting birds.
Møller, Anders Pape; Balbontín, Javier; Dhondt, André A; Remes, Vladimir; Adriaensen, Frank; Biard, Clotilde; Camprodon, Jordi; Cichon, Mariusz; Doligez, Blandine; Dubiec, Anna; Eens, Marcel; Eeva, Tapio; Goodenough, Anne E; Gosler, Andrew G; Gustafsson, Lars; Heeb, Philipp; Hinsley, Shelley A; Jacob, Staffan; Juskaitis, Rimvydas; Laaksonen, Toni; Leclercq, Bernard; Massa, Bruno; Mazgajski, Tomasz D; Nager, Ruedi G; Nilsson, Jan-Åke; Nilsson, Sven G; Norte, Ana C; Pinxten, Rianne; Robles, Hugo; Solonen, Tapio; Sorace, Alberto; van Noordwijk, Arie J; Lambrechts, Marcel M.
Afiliación
  • Møller AP; Ecologie Systematique Evolution, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay Cedex, France.
  • Balbontín J; Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Dhondt AA; Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Remes V; Laboratory of Ornithology, Department of Zoology, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Adriaensen F; Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Biard C; IEES-Paris - Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UPEC, Paris, France.
  • Camprodon J; Àrea de Biodiversitat, Grup de Biologia de la Conservació, Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya, Solsona, Spain.
  • Cichon M; Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
  • Doligez B; CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR 5558, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
  • Dubiec A; Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Eens M; Department of Biology, Behavioural Ecology & Ecophysiology Group, Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Eeva T; Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Goodenough AE; Department of Natural and Social Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Gosler AG; Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology & Institute of Human Sciences, Oxford, UK.
  • Gustafsson L; Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biolpgy Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Heeb P; Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique, UPS Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
  • Hinsley SA; CEH Wallingford, Wallingford, UK.
  • Jacob S; Station d'Ecologie Expérimentale du CNRS à Moulis, USR CNRS 2936, Moulis, France.
  • Juskaitis R; Institute of Ecology of Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Laaksonen T; Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Leclercq B; Fleurey-sur-Ouche, France.
  • Massa B; Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
  • Mazgajski TD; Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Nager RG; Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Nilsson JÅ; Department of Biology, Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Nilsson SG; Department of Biology, Biodiversity, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Norte AC; Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Pinxten R; Department of Biology, Behavioural Ecology & Ecophysiology Group, Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Robles H; Faculty of Social Sciences, Didactica Research Group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Solonen T; Evolutionary Ecology Group (GIBE), Faculty of Sciences, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
  • Sorace A; Evolutionary Ecology Group (EVECO), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • van Noordwijk AJ; Luontotutkimus Solonen Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lambrechts MM; ISPRA, Rome, Italy.
J Anim Ecol ; 87(6): 1738-1748, 2018 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30101503
Coexistence between great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus, but also other hole-nesting taxa, constitutes a classic example of species co-occurrence resulting in potential interference and exploitation competition for food and for breeding and roosting sites. However, the spatial and temporal variations in coexistence and its consequences for competition remain poorly understood. We used an extensive database on reproduction in nest boxes by great and blue tits based on 87 study plots across Europe and Northern Africa during 1957-2012 for a total of 19,075 great tit and 16,729 blue tit clutches to assess correlative evidence for a relationship between laying date and clutch size, respectively, and density consistent with effects of intraspecific and interspecific competition. In an initial set of analyses, we statistically controlled for a suite of site-specific variables. We found evidence for an effect of intraspecific competition on blue tit laying date (later laying at higher density) and clutch size (smaller clutch size at higher density), but no evidence of significant effects of intraspecific competition in great tits, nor effects of interspecific competition for either species. To further control for site-specific variation caused by a range of potentially confounding variables, we compared means and variances in laying date and clutch size of great and blue tits among three categories of difference in density between the two species. We exploited the fact that means and variances are generally positively correlated. If interspecific competition occurs, we predicted a reduction in mean and an increase in variance in clutch size in great tit and blue tit when density of heterospecifics is higher than the density of conspecifics, and for intraspecific competition, this reduction would occur when density of conspecifics is higher than the density of heterospecifics. Such comparisons of temporal patterns of means and variances revealed evidence, for both species, consistent with intraspecific competition and to a smaller extent with interspecific competition. These findings suggest that competition associated with reproductive behaviour between blue and great tits is widespread, but also varies across large spatial and temporal scales.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Passeriformes Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: Africa / Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Anim Ecol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Passeriformes Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: Africa / Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Anim Ecol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido