Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detection of visual stimuli on monocular peripheral head-worn displays.
Pascale, Michael T; Sanderson, Penelope; Liu, David; Mohamed, Ismail; Stigter, Nicola; Loeb, Robert G.
Afiliación
  • Pascale MT; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: michael.pascale@uq.net.au.
  • Sanderson P; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; School of ITEE, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
  • Liu D; School of ITEE, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
  • Mohamed I; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; School of ITEE, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
  • Stigter N; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
  • Loeb RG; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Appl Ergon ; 73: 167-173, 2018 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30098632
OBJECTIVE: To compare people's ability to detect peripherally presented stimuli on a monocular head-worn display (HWD) versus a conventional screen. BACKGROUND: Visual attention capture has been systematically investigated, but not with respect to HWDs. How stimulus properties affect attention capture is likely to be different on an HWD when compared to a traditional computer display. METHOD: Participants performed an ongoing perceptual task and attempted to detect stimuli that were displayed peripherally on either a computer monitor or a monocular HWD. RESULTS: Participants were less able to detect peripheral stimuli when the stimuli were presented on a HWD than when presented on a computer monitor. Moreover, the disadvantage of the HWD was more pronounced when peripheral stimuli were less distinct and when the stimuli were presented further into the periphery. CONCLUSION: Presenting stimuli on a monocular head-worn display reduces participants' ability to notice peripheral visual stimuli compared to presentation on a normal computer monitor. This effect increases as stimuli are presented further in the periphery, but can be ameliorated to a degree by using high-contrast stimuli. APPLICATION: The findings are useful for designers creating visual stimuli intended to capture attention when viewed on a peripherally positioned monocular head-worn display.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción Visual / Presentación de Datos / Visión Monocular / Campos Visuales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción Visual / Presentación de Datos / Visión Monocular / Campos Visuales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido