Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of prostate boost with high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of intermediate-high risk prostate cancer.
Vu, Charles C; Blas, Kevin G; Lanni, Thomas B; Gustafson, Gary S; Krauss, Daniel J.
Afiliación
  • Vu CC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI.
  • Blas KG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI.
  • Lanni TB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Dearborn, MI.
  • Gustafson GS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Troy, MI.
  • Krauss DJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI. Electronic address: Daniel.Krauss@beaumont.edu.
Brachytherapy ; 17(6): 852-857, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30076108
PURPOSE: The recently published ASCENDE-RT randomized clinical trial demonstrated improved biochemical control, albeit with increased toxicity, for a prostate boost with brachytherapy versus external beam radiation therapy alone in patients with intermediate-high risk prostate cancer. In this study, we investigated the cost-effectiveness of these two modalities in the treatment of intermediate-high risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multistate Markov model was created to model a patient with intermediate-high risk prostate cancer. The two treatment options modeled were (1) 23 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and two fractions of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (brachytherapy boost) and (2) 44 fractions of IMRT (IMRT alone). Each patient received 1 year of hormone therapy, per the ASCENDE-RT protocol. Model assumptions, including clinical outcomes, toxicity, and utilities were derived from the medical literature. Costs of radiation therapy were estimated using Medicare reimbursement data. RESULTS: The estimated expected lifetime cost of brachytherapy boost was $68,696, compared to $114,944 for IMRT alone. Brachytherapy boost significantly lowered expected lifetime treatment costs because it decreased the incidence of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, cutting the use of expensive targeted therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Brachytherapy boost had an expected quality-adjusted life years of 10.8 years, compared to 9.3 years for IMRT alone. One-way sensitivity analyses of our results found brachytherapy boost to be cost-effective over a wide range of cost, utility, and cancer progression rate assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost is a cost-effective treatment for intermediate-high risk prostate cancer compared to IMRT alone.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Braquiterapia / Costos de la Atención en Salud / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Braquiterapia / Costos de la Atención en Salud / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos