Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using an upper extremity exoskeleton for semi-autonomous exercise during inpatient neurological rehabilitation- a pilot study.
Büsching, Imke; Sehle, Aida; Stürner, Jana; Liepert, Joachim.
Afiliación
  • Büsching I; Department of Neurorehabilitation, Kliniken Schmieder, Zum Tafelholz 8, D- 78476, Allensbach, Germany.
  • Sehle A; Reha-Klinik Bellikon, Mutschellenstrasse 2, 5454, Bellikon, Switzerland.
  • Stürner J; Department of Neurorehabilitation, Kliniken Schmieder, Zum Tafelholz 8, D- 78476, Allensbach, Germany.
  • Liepert J; Department of Neurorehabilitation, Kliniken Schmieder, Zum Tafelholz 8, D- 78476, Allensbach, Germany.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 15(1): 72, 2018 08 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30068372
BACKGROUND: Motor deficits are the most common symptoms after stroke. There is some evidence that intensity and amount of exercises influence the degree of improvement of functions within the first 6 months after the injury. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of semi-autonomous exercises with an upper extremity exoskeleton in addition to an inpatient rehabilitation program. In addition, changes of motor functions were examined. METHODS: Ten stroke patients with a severe upper extremity paresis were included. They were offered to perform a semi-autonomous training with a gravity-supported, computer-enhanced device (Armeo®Spring, Hocoma AG) six times per week for 4 weeks. Feasibility was evaluated by weekly structured interviews with patients and supervisors. Motor functions were assessed before and after the training period using the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for assessing pre-post differences. The Pearson correlation co-efficient was used for correlating the number of completed sessions with the change in motor function. Acceptance of the device and the level of satisfaction with the training were determined by a questionnaire based on visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Neither patients nor supervisors reported side effects. However, one patient had to be excluded from analysis because of transportation difficulties from the ward to the treatment facility. Therefore, analysis was based on nine patients. On average, 13.2 (55%) sessions were realized. WMFT results showed significant improvements of proximal arm functions. The number of sessions correlated with the degree of shoulder force improvement. Patients rated the exercises to be motivating, and enjoyable and would continue using the Armeo®Spring at home if they had the opportunity. CONCLUSION: Using an upper extremity exoskeleton for semi-autonomous training in an inpatient setting is feasible without side effects and is positively rated by the patients. It might further support the recovery of upper extremity function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered. Registration number ISRCTN42633681 .
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia por Ejercicio / Dispositivo Exoesqueleto / Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neuroeng Rehabil Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia por Ejercicio / Dispositivo Exoesqueleto / Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neuroeng Rehabil Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Reino Unido