Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Discrimination of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses; Utility of ADC and Relative ADC.
Yilmaz, Ebru; Sari, Ozcan; Yilmaz, Ayhan; Ucar, Nese; Aslan, Ahmet; Inan, Ibrahim; Parlakkilic, Ulku Tuba.
Afiliación
  • Yilmaz E; GOP Taksim Training and Educational Hospital, TR.
  • Sari O; GOP Taksim Training and Educational Hospital, TR.
  • Yilmaz A; Bezmialem Vakif University Hospital, TR.
  • Ucar N; GOP Taksim Training and Educational Hospital, TR.
  • Aslan A; Medeniyet University Hospital, TR.
  • Inan I; Medeniyet University Hospital, TR.
  • Parlakkilic UT; GOP Taksim Training and Educational Hospital, TR.
J Belg Soc Radiol ; 102(1): 24, 2018 Feb 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039037
PURPOSE: To determine the contribution of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and relative ADC (rADC) values to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of patients with benign or malignant breast masses diagnosed either by histopathological findings or by follow-up imaging were evaluated retrospectively. Histopathological analyses were performed for 71 lesions (80.7%) while the remaining were followed up every six months for one year. DWI was performed using b-values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm2, and ADC and rADC were calculated and compared. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden index were used to evaluate the parameter's optimal threshold and diagnostic value. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-eight lesions from a total of 81 patients, aged between 16 and 73 (mean age 42 ± 11.3) years were obtained and evaluated. Pathological results of 34 (38.6%) out of 71 lesions were malignant and 37 lesions (42%) were benign. Seventeen (19.3%) lesions remained stable at one-year follow-up and were accepted as benign breast masses. Mean ADC values of benign and malignant lesions were 1.584 × 10-3mm2/sec and 0.884 × 10-3mm2/sec (p < 0.05), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of ADC were 88% and 87%, respectively at a cut-off value of 1.04 × 10-3mm2/sec. Mean rADC was 0.931 for benign lesions and 0.557 for malignant lesions (p < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 83% at a cut-off value of 0.639. No prominent superiority of rADC over ADC is identified in the differentiation of breast masses. CONCLUSION: ADC and rADC values derived from DWI can be equally useful in clinical setting to differentiate benign from malignant breast masses.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Belg Soc Radiol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Belg Soc Radiol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido