Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen.
Morrell, Jane Margaret; Valeanu, Andra Sabina; Lundeheim, Nils; Johannisson, Anders.
Afiliación
  • Morrell JM; Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. jane.morrell@slu.se.
  • Valeanu AS; Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Lundeheim N; University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Iasi, 3, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iasi, Romania.
  • Johannisson A; Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Vet Scand ; 60(1): 41, 2018 Jul 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29973236
BACKGROUND: There is speculation that beef bull semen quality is inferior to that of dairy bulls although few scientific studies are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate sperm quality in beef bull semen and to determine which parameters could be indicative of fertility after insemination. Sperm quality, assessed by computer assisted sperm motility analysis and flow cytometric evaluation of membrane integrity, levels of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial membrane potential, acrosome status and DNA fragmentation index, was evaluated in beef and dairy bull semen. RESULTS: For beef bulls, normal morphology (r = 0.62, P < 0.05) and WOBBLE (r = 0.57, P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with 56-day non-return rate, whereas sperm quality was not significantly correlated with the fertility index score for dairy bulls. Membrane integrity (46 ± 8.0% versus 40 ± 11%, P < 0.05), normal morphology (87 ± 6% versus 76 ± 8%; P < 0.05), and high respiratory activity (52 ± 13 versus 12 ± 4%; P < 0.001) were higher for dairy bulls than for beef bulls. The DNA fragmentation index was lower for dairy bull spermatozoa than beef (3.8 ± 1.1% versus 6.1 ± 2.9%; P < 0.01), whereas some sperm kinematics were higher. Multivariate analysis indicated that type of bull (beef versus dairy) had an impact on sperm quality. CONCLUSIONS: Different assays of sperm quality may be needed for appropriate analysis of beef and dairy bull semen. These finding could be important for cattle breeding stations when evaluating semen quality.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Semen / Motilidad Espermática / Bovinos / Criopreservación / Análisis de Semen Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Acta Vet Scand Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Semen / Motilidad Espermática / Bovinos / Criopreservación / Análisis de Semen Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Acta Vet Scand Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido