Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Major hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: a comparative study of laparoscopic versus open treatment.
Peng, Jian-Xin; Wang, Ling-Zhi; Diao, Jing-Fang; Tan, Zhi-Jian; Zhong, Xiao-Sheng; Zhen, Zhi-Peng; Chen, Gui-Hao; He, Jun-Ming.
Afiliación
  • Peng JX; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang LZ; Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China.
  • Diao JF; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Tan ZJ; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhong XS; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhen ZP; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Chen GH; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • He JM; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China. hejunming0101@sina.com.
Surg Endosc ; 32(10): 4271-4276, 2018 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29616339
BACKGROUND: Due to higher technical requirements, laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) for primary hepatolithiasis have been limited to a few institutions. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the therapeutic safety, and perioperative and long-term outcomes of LMH versus open major hepatectomy (OMH) for hepatolithiasis. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2016, 61 patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent major hepatectomy were enrolled, including 29 LMH and 32 OMH. The perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications, as well as long-term outcomes, including the stone clearance and recurrence rate, were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference of surgical procedures between the two groups. The mean operation time was (262 ± 83) min in the LMH group and (214 ± 66) min in the OMH group (p = 0.05). There is no difference of intra-operative bleeding (310 ± 233) ml versus (421 ± 359) ml (p = 0.05). In the LMH group, there were shorter time to postoperative oral intake ((1.1 ± 0.6) days versus (3.1 ± 1.8) days, p = 0.01) and shorter hospital stay [(7.2 ± 2.3) days versus (11.8 ± 5.5) days, p = 0.03] than the open group. The LMH group had comparable stone clearance rate with the OMH group during the initial surgery (82.8% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: LMH could be an effective and safe treatment for selected patients with hepatolithiasis, with an advantage over OMH in the field of less intra-operative blood loss, less intra-operative transfusion, less overall complications, and faster postoperative recovery.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos / Laparoscopía / Hepatectomía / Hepatopatías Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos / Laparoscopía / Hepatectomía / Hepatopatías Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania