Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accelerate PhenoTestTM BC Kit Versus Conventional Methods for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Positive Bloodstream Isolates: Potential Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship.
Sofjan, Amelia K; Casey, Benjamin O; Xu, Boxin A; Amadio, Jonathan; Restrepo, Alejandro; Alam, M Jahangir; Garey, Kevin W.
Afiliación
  • Sofjan AK; 1 University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Casey BO; 1 University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Xu BA; 1 University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Amadio J; 1 University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Restrepo A; 2 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Alam MJ; 1 University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Garey KW; 1 University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Ann Pharmacother ; 52(8): 754-762, 2018 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29557208
BACKGROUND: The Accelerate PhenoTestTM BC kit (AXDX) provides rapid organism identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results. Its potential role for antimicrobial stewardship is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of AXDX with conventional methods (CMs) and assess AXDX's potential role for antimicrobial stewardship in patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults with Staphylococcus aureus or Enterococcus spp BSIs from July 2014 to January 2016 at a tertiary care medical center. Available isolates were tested on AXDX, and ID and AST results from AXDX were compared with those from CMs (VITEK 2 or ETEST). The following antibiotics were assessed for categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) between the methods: ampicillin and daptomycin ( Enterococcus spp only), erythromycin and cefoxitin ( S aureus only), linezolid, and vancomycin. Potential role of AXDX for stewardship was assessed via a retrospective audit by infectious diseases clinicians. RESULTS: We included 231 patients with S aureus (n = 112) or Enterococcus spp (n = 119) BSIs, and 106 unique isolates were available for ID and AST performance analyses. Sensitivity and specificity of AXDX for ID were 98.0% and 99.5%, respectively. CA and EA for the tested antibiotics were >97%. In Monte Carlo simulations, AXDX coupled with stewardship personnel (either 24/7 or Monday to Friday) would have allowed unnecessary therapy to be stopped and active/targeted therapy to be started ≥24 hours sooner in >50% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CMs, AXDX had similar diagnostic accuracy and can potentially optimize therapy sooner in patients with Gram-positive BSIs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana / Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Bacterias Grampositivas / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Pharmacother Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana / Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Bacterias Grampositivas / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Pharmacother Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos