Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Public insurance program impact on catastrophic health expenditure on acute myocardial infarction.
Martínez-García, M; Vargas-Barrón, J; Bañuelos-Téllez, F; González-Pacheco, H; Fresno, C; Hernández-Lemus, E; Martínez-Ríos, M A; Vallejo, M.
Afiliación
  • Martínez-García M; Sociomedical Research Department, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico; Ph.D. Programme in Collective Health, Practices and Policies in Healthcare, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Xochimilco, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Vargas-Barrón J; National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Bañuelos-Téllez F; Planning Division, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • González-Pacheco H; Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Fresno C; Computational Genomics Division, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Hernández-Lemus E; Computational Genomics Division, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Martínez-Ríos MA; National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Vallejo M; Sociomedical Research Department, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico. Electronic address: maite_vallejo@yahoo.com.mx.
Public Health ; 158: 47-54, 2018 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547759
OBJECTIVE: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has an important economic burden that poised the urgent need to evaluate its catastrophic medical expense. This study evaluates the first 5 years of the national health initiative called Popular Insurance (PI) at the National Institute of Cardiology in Mexico. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. METHODS: STEMI patients with (n=317) and without (n=260) PI were selected. Analysed variables included socio-economical context, management care, cost evaluation and three outcomes (mortality, hospital readmission and therapeutic adherence). Descriptive statistical analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival and Support Vector Machine models were used accordingly. RESULTS: Treatment costs were higher for PI-covered individuals (P=0.022) and only 1.89% of them remained in debt, in contrast to 16.15% of those without PI. Statistically significant differences were found in relation to days in hospital wards (P<0.001), imaging studies (P<0.001) and surgical materials (P=0.04). Survival analysis (P=0.44) and therapeutic adherence (P=0.38) showed no differences. Hospital readmission was predicted with an 81.97% accuracy. The most important predictive variables included were stent type, number of days at the coronary care unit and hospital wards. CONCLUSIONS: The PI has proven to be a successful program where no differences were found in terms of health care and survival, whereas it provides timely financial support for families facing catastrophic health challenging events.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Catastrófica / Gastos en Salud / Infarto del Miocardio / Programas Nacionales de Salud Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: México Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Catastrófica / Gastos en Salud / Infarto del Miocardio / Programas Nacionales de Salud Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: México Pais de publicación: Países Bajos