A comparison of endoscopic and non-endoscopic biliary intervention outcomes in patients with prior bariatric surgery.
Endosc Int Open
; 6(1): E11-E28, 2018 Jan.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29340294
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic biliary intervention (BI) is often difficult to perform in patients with prior bariatric surgery (BRS). We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with prior BRS undergoing endoscopic and non-endoscopic BI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2007â-â2011) was reviewed to identify all adult inpatients (≥â18 years) with a history of BRS undergoing BI. The clinical outcomes of interest were in-patient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges. RESULTS: There were 7,343 patients with prior BRS who underwent BIs where a majority were endoscopic (4,482 vs. 2,861, P â<â0.01). The mean age was 50±30.8 years and the majority were females (80.5â%). Gallstone-related disease was the most common indication for BI and managed more often with primary endoscopic management (2,146 vs. 1,132, P â<â0.01). Inpatient mortality was not significantly different between patients undergoing primary endoscopic versus non-endoscopic BI (0.2â% vs. 0.7â%, P â=â0.2). Patients with sepsis were significantly more likely to incur failed primary endoscopic BI (OR 2.74, 95â% CI 1.15, 6.53) and were more likely to be managed with non-endoscopic BI (OR 2.13, 95â% CI 1.3, 3.5). Primary non-endoscopic BI and failed endoscopic BI were both associated with longer LOS (by 1.77 days, P â<â0.01 and by 2.17 days, P â<â0.01, respectively) and higher hospitals charges (by $11,400, P â<â0.01 and by $â14,200, P â<â0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Primary endoscopic management may be a safe and cost-effective approach for patients with prior BRS who need BI. While primary endoscopic biliary intervention is more common, primary non-endoscopic intervention may be used more often for sepsis.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudio:
Prognostic_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Endosc Int Open
Año:
2018
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Estados Unidos
Pais de publicación:
Alemania