Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bilateral balanced occlusion compared to other occlusal schemes in complete dentures: A systematic review.
Lemos, C A A; Verri, F R; Gomes, J M L; Santiago Júnior, J F; Moraes, S L D; Pellizzer, E P.
Afiliación
  • Lemos CAA; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Verri FR; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gomes JML; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Santiago Júnior JF; Department of Health Sciences, Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação (PRPPG), Universidade do Sagrado Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Moraes SLD; Department of Prosthodontics, Dentistry School of University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Pellizzer EP; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Oral Rehabil ; 45(4): 344-354, 2018 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29314199
No consensus has been reached regarding the best occlusal scheme for making complete dentures. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO) with other occlusal schemes (canine guidance, lingualised occlusion and zero degree) in complete dentures. The schemes were compared in terms of quality of life/satisfaction and masticatory performance. Two independent reviewers performed a comprehensive search of studies published in or before October 2017 using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases. The search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The focused question was: "In conventional complete denture, is BBO better than lingualised occlusion, canine guidance and zero degree in terms of quality of life, patient satisfaction and masticatory performance/muscle activity?" Seventeen studies were selected for analysis. In total, there were 492 patients with a mean age of 64.78 years and a mean follow-up duration of 2.96 months (range: 1-6 months). All studies compared BBO with the other occlusal schemes. Eleven studies evaluated the influence of the occlusal scheme designs on quality of life and satisfaction, and 8 studies evaluated masticatory performance and muscle activity between BBO and the other occlusion schemes. The present systematic review indicated that BBO does not confer better quality of life/satisfaction or masticatory performance and muscle activity. Thus, lingualised occlusion can be considered a predictable occlusal scheme for complete dentures in terms of quality of life/satisfaction and masticatory performance, while canine guidance can be used to reduce muscular activity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Boca Edéntula / Oclusión Dental Balanceada / Dentadura Completa / Masticación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Oral Rehabil Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Boca Edéntula / Oclusión Dental Balanceada / Dentadura Completa / Masticación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Oral Rehabil Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Reino Unido