Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Responses of an American eel brain endothelial-like cell line to selenium deprivation and to selenite, selenate, and selenomethionine additions in different exposure media.
Bloch, Sophia R; Kim, John J; Pham, Phuc H; Hodson, Peter V; Lee, Lucy E J; Bols, Niels C.
Afiliación
  • Bloch SR; Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
  • Kim JJ; Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
  • Pham PH; Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
  • Hodson PV; Department of Biology and School of Environmental Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
  • Lee LEJ; Faculty of Science, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC, V2S 7M8, Canada.
  • Bols NC; Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. ncbols@uwaterloo.ca.
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim ; 53(10): 940-953, 2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28940125
The effect of selenium deprivation and addition on the American eel brain endothelial cell line (eelB) was studied in three exposure media: complete growth medium (L15/FBS), serum-free medium (L15), and minimal medium (L15/ex). L15/ex contains only galactose and pyruvate and allowed the deprivation of selenium on cells to be studied. In L15/ex, without any obvious source of selenium, eelB cells survived for at least 7 d, formed capillary-like structures (CLS) on Matrigel, and migrated to heal wounds. Three selenium compounds were added to cultures: selenite, selenate, and selenomethionine (SeMet). Adding selenite or selenate to eelB cell cultures for 24 h caused dose-dependent declines in cell viability, regardless of the exposure media. Although varying with exposure media and viability end point, selenite was approximately 70-fold more cytotoxic than selenate. By contrast, 24 h exposures to either DL- or L-SeMet in the three media caused little or no cytotoxicity. However for 7 d exposures in L15/ex, DL- and L-SeMet were very cytotoxic, even at the lowest tested concentration of 31 µM. By contrast in L15 and L15/FBS, cytotoxicity was only observed with 500 and 1000 µM L-SeMet. In L15/FBS, eelB continued to migrate and form CLS in the presence of SeMet but at 500 µM, cell migration appeared stimulated. As judged from a colony-forming assay over 14 d in L15/FBS, 500 and 1000 µM DL- and L-SeMet inhibited cell proliferation. Overall, the responses of eel cells to selenium depended on the selenium form, concentration, and exposure media, with responses to SeMet being most dependent on exposure media.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Selenio / Encéfalo / Compuestos de Selenio / Medios de Cultivo / Anguilla Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Selenio / Encéfalo / Compuestos de Selenio / Medios de Cultivo / Anguilla Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Alemania