Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is digital photography an accurate and precise method for measuring range of motion of the hip and knee?
Russo, Russell R; Burn, Matthew B; Ismaily, Sabir K; Gerrie, Brayden J; Han, Shuyang; Alexander, Jerry; Lenherr, Christopher; Noble, Philip C; Harris, Joshua D; McCulloch, Patrick C.
Afiliación
  • Russo RR; Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6445 Main Street, Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Burn MB; Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6445 Main Street, Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Ismaily SK; Institute for Orthopaedic Research & Education (IORE), Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gerrie BJ; Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6445 Main Street, Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Han S; Institute for Orthopaedic Research & Education (IORE), Houston, TX, USA.
  • Alexander J; Institute for Orthopaedic Research & Education (IORE), Houston, TX, USA.
  • Lenherr C; Institute for Orthopaedic Research & Education (IORE), Houston, TX, USA.
  • Noble PC; Institute for Orthopaedic Research & Education (IORE), Houston, TX, USA.
  • Harris JD; Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6445 Main Street, Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • McCulloch PC; Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6445 Main Street, Outpatient Center, Suite 2500, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. PCMcculloch@houstonmethodist.org.
J Exp Orthop ; 4(1): 29, 2017 Sep 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28884315
BACKGROUND: Accurate measurements of knee and hip motion are required for management of musculoskeletal pathology. The purpose of this investigation was to compare three techniques for measuring motion at the hip and knee. The authors hypothesized that digital photography would be equivalent in accuracy and show higher precision compared to the other two techniques. METHODS: Using infrared motion capture analysis as the reference standard, hip flexion/abduction/internal rotation/external rotation and knee flexion/extension were measured using visual estimation, goniometry, and photography on 10 fresh frozen cadavers. These measurements were performed by three physical therapists and three orthopaedic surgeons. Accuracy was defined by the difference from the reference standard, while precision was defined by the proportion of measurements within either 5° or 10°. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-tests, and chi-squared tests were used. RESULTS: Although two statistically significant differences were found in measurement accuracy between the three techniques, neither of these differences met clinical significance (difference of 1.4° for hip abduction and 1.7° for the knee extension). Precision of measurements was significantly higher for digital photography than: (i) visual estimation for hip abduction and knee extension, and (ii) goniometry for knee extension only. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinically significant difference in measurement accuracy between the three techniques for hip and knee motion. Digital photography only showed higher precision for two joint motions (hip abduction and knee extension). Overall digital photography shows equivalent accuracy and near-equivalent precision to visual estimation and goniometry.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Exp Orthop Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Exp Orthop Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania