Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jiang, Hongyang; Yu, Zhe; Chen, Liping; Wang, Tao; Liu, Zhuo; Liu, Jihong; Wang, Shaogang; Ye, Zhangqun.
Afiliación
  • Jiang H; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
  • Yu Z; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
  • Chen L; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
  • Wang T; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
  • Liu Z; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
  • Liu J; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
  • Wang S; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
  • Ye Z; Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430030, China.
Biomed Res Int ; 2017: 2035851, 2017.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28553645
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both alternatives for PCNL to treat renal calculi. This study is aimed at comparing the stone-free rate (SFR) and other surgery parameters of two approaches for treating upper urinary calculi. We performed this meta-analysis in September 2016 by searching studies about mini-PCNL and RIRS for treating upper urinary calculi in various databases, and RevMan v.5.3 was applied. Three randomized controlled trials and ten nonrandomized trials were included, involving a total of 1317 patients. Meta-analysis showed that mini-PCNL group led to a higher SFR [odds ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.46-2.64; P < 0.00001] but brought a larger postoperative decrease in hemoglobin levels compared with RIRS. RIRS provided a shorter hospital time. There was no significant difference in operation time. Higher postoperative complications were detected in the mini-PCNL, but the difference was not significant. Grade I and III complications did not vary between two procedures, but grade II complications were of lower incidence in RIRS group. In the light of these results, compared with RIRS, mini-PCNL provided significantly higher SFR and efficiency quotient for managing calculi; however, it resulted in higher incidence of postoperative complications, larger hemoglobin drops, and longer hospital stay.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Urinarios / Nefrolitotomía Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Res Int Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Urinarios / Nefrolitotomía Percutánea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Res Int Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos