Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study with costs analysis on 269 patients.
Soliani, G; De Troia, A; Portinari, M; Targa, S; Carcoforo, P; Vasquez, G; Fisichella, P M; Feo, C V.
Afiliación
  • Soliani G; University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • De Troia A; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Portinari M; University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Targa S; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Carcoforo P; University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Vasquez G; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Fisichella PM; University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Feo CV; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Hernia ; 21(4): 609-618, 2017 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28396956
PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes and institutional costs of elective laparoscopic and open incisional hernia mesh repairs and to identify independent predictors of prolonged operative time and hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study on 269 consecutive patients who underwent elective incisional hernia mesh repair, laparoscopic group (N = 94) and open group (N = 175), between May 2004 and July 2014. RESULTS: Operative time was shorter in the laparoscopic versus open group (p < 0.0001). Perioperative morbidity and mortality were similar in the two groups. Patients in the laparoscopic group were discharged a median of 2 days earlier (p < 0.0001). At a median follow-up over 50 months, no difference in hernia recurrence was detected between the groups. In laparoscopic group total institutional costs were lower (p = 0.02). At Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders, large wall defect (W3) and higher operative risk (ASA score 3-4) were associated with prolonged operative time, while midline hernia site was associated with increased hospital LOS. Open surgical approach was associated with prolongation of both operative time and LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach may be considered safely to all patients for incisional hernia repair, regardless of patients' characteristics (age, gender, BMI, ASA score, comorbidities) and size of the wall defect (W2-3), with the advantage of shorter operating time and hospital LOS that yields reduced total institutional costs. Patients with higher ASA score and large hernia defects are at risk of prolonged operative time, while an open approach is associated with longer duration of surgical operation and hospital LOS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Laparoscopía / Herniorrafia / Hernia Incisional Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Hernia Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Laparoscopía / Herniorrafia / Hernia Incisional Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Hernia Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Francia