Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phaco-trabectome versus phaco-iStent in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Kurji, Khaliq; Rudnisky, Christopher J; Rayat, Jaspreet S; Arora, Sourabh; Sandhu, Simrenjeet; Damji, Karim F; Dorey, Michael W.
Afiliación
  • Kurji K; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Rudnisky CJ; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Rayat JS; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Arora S; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Sandhu S; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Damji KF; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Dorey MW; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. Electronic address: dorey1@ualberta.ca.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 52(1): 99-106, 2017 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28237158
OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy and safety of phaco-trabectome (PT) versus phaco-iStent (Pi) for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Retrospective comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 70 eyes of 55 patients with OAG underwent either PT surgery by a single surgeon or Pi (insertion of 2 stents) by another surgeon in Canada between January 2010 and December 2012. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent either PT or Pi surgery were reviewed. All patients who satisfied both the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the outcomes analyses. IOP reduction, reduction in glaucoma medication, safety profile, and best-corrected visual acuity were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-six eyes of 30 patients had PT and 34 eyes of 25 patients had Pi. Baseline IOP was higher in the PT group (20.92 ± 5.07 mm Hg) than in the Pi group (17.47 ± 4.87 mm Hg; p = 0.026). At 12 months there was no significant difference between groups in relative reduction of mean IOP (PT -5.09 ± 5.73, 24% relative reduction vs. Pi -3.84 ± 3.80, 22% relative reduction; p = 0.331) or glaucoma medication use (PT -0.49 ± 1.17 vs. Pi -0.26 ± 0.73; p = 0.168) from baseline. However, Pi had significantly fewer individual complications (PT 20 vs. Pi 5; p < 0.0001) throughout the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: At 12 months of follow-up, both techniques significantly lowered IOP, but fewer complications were observed in the Pi group.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trabeculectomía / Agudeza Visual / Stents / Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto / Presión Intraocular Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Can J Ophthalmol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trabeculectomía / Agudeza Visual / Stents / Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto / Presión Intraocular Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Can J Ophthalmol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido