Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Observing bedside rounds for faculty development.
Mookherjee, Somnath; Cabrera, Daniel; McKinney, Christy M; Kaplan, Elizabeth; Robins, Lynne.
Afiliación
  • Mookherjee S; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Cabrera D; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • McKinney CM; Division of Craniofacial Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Kaplan E; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Robins L; Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Clin Teach ; 14(6): 446-450, 2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28225194
BACKGROUND: Bedside rounds are an ideal opportunity for clinical teaching. We previously offered faculty development on balancing learner autonomy, patient care and teaching. We noticed that participants often asked whether attending physicians and learners shared the same perceptions of the key elements (patient-centredness, efficiency and educational value) of bedside rounds. Understanding these perceptions and identifying areas of discordance would inform faculty development for optimal bedside rounds. METHODS: At a university hospital we observed 16 attending physicians and 47 learners over 112 patient encounters. We noted the length of rounds and the number of interruptions. Participants were surveyed on their perception of the attending physicians' efficacy in preparing the team for rounds, and the efficiency and educational value of the rounds. Bedside rounds are an ideal opportunity for clinical teaching FINDINGS: After the same rounds, compared with the attending physicians, learners perceived the patient-centredness, efficiency and educational value of the rounds to be significantly higher. Learners rated attending physicians higher than attending physicians did themselves on learner autonomy, appropriate supervision, conferring responsibility for the care plan to learners and not interrupting. There was no correlation between interruptions and length of the rounds, or learner or attending physician perception of key elements of the rounds. Learners tended to attribute greater efficacy to attending physicians for team preparation than attending physicians did themselves. CONCLUSION: We identified salient beliefs and practices on bedside teaching. Our findings suggest that identifying shared goals and expectations, and creating metrics to define successful rounds, may help attending physicians to better synergize with learners. Interruptions need not be eschewed completely for the purpose of achieving efficient rounds. Integrating these measures into faculty development may bolster the quality of bedside rounds.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Docentes Médicos / Rondas de Enseñanza Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Teach Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Docentes Médicos / Rondas de Enseñanza Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Teach Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido