Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of bacterial communities from lava cave microbial mats to overlying surface soils from Lava Beds National Monument, USA.
Lavoie, Kathleen H; Winter, Ara S; Read, Kaitlyn J H; Hughes, Evan M; Spilde, Michael N; Northup, Diana E.
Afiliación
  • Lavoie KH; Biology, State University of New York, College at Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY, United States of America.
  • Winter AS; Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
  • Read KJ; Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
  • Hughes EM; Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
  • Spilde MN; Institute of Meteoritics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
  • Northup DE; Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 12(2): e0169339, 2017.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28199330
Subsurface habitats harbor novel diversity that has received little attention until recently. Accessible subsurface habitats include lava caves around the world that often support extensive microbial mats on ceilings and walls in a range of colors. Little is known about lava cave microbial diversity and how these subsurface mats differ from microbial communities in overlying surface soils. To investigate these differences, we analyzed bacterial 16S rDNA from 454 pyrosequencing from three colors of microbial mats (tan, white, and yellow) from seven lava caves in Lava Beds National Monument, CA, USA, and compared them with surface soil overlying each cave. The same phyla were represented in both surface soils and cave microbial mats, but the overlap in shared OTUs (operational taxonomic unit) was only 11.2%. Number of entrances per cave and temperature contributed to observed differences in diversity. In terms of species richness, diversity by mat color differed, but not significantly. Actinobacteria dominated in all cave samples, with 39% from caves and 21% from surface soils. Proteobacteria made up 30% of phyla from caves and 36% from surface soil. Other major phyla in caves were Nitrospirae (7%) followed by minor phyla (7%), compared to surface soils with Bacteroidetes (8%) and minor phyla (8%). Many of the most abundant sequences could not be identified to genus, indicating a high degree of novelty. Surface soil samples had more OTUs and greater diversity indices than cave samples. Although surface soil microbes immigrate into underlying caves, the environment selects for microbes able to live in the cave habitats, resulting in very different cave microbial communities. This study is the first comprehensive comparison of bacterial communities in lava caves with the overlying soil community.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Microbiología del Suelo / ADN Bacteriano / ADN Ribosómico / ARN Ribosómico 16S / Consorcios Microbianos País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Microbiología del Suelo / ADN Bacteriano / ADN Ribosómico / ARN Ribosómico 16S / Consorcios Microbianos País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos