Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Soft Tissue Augmentation Techniques in Implants Placed and Provisionalized Immediately: A Systematic Review.
Rojo, Rosa; Prados-Frutos, Juan Carlos; Manchón, Ángel; Rodríguez-Molinero, Jesús; Sammartino, Gilberto; Calvo Guirado, José Luis; Gómez-de Diego, Rafael.
Afiliación
  • Rojo R; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
  • Prados-Frutos JC; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
  • Manchón Á; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
  • Rodríguez-Molinero J; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
  • Sammartino G; Department of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federico II University, Corso Umberto I 40, 80138 Naples, Italy.
  • Calvo Guirado JL; Department of International Dentistry Research, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, San Antonio Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Avenida Jerónimos 135, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
  • Gómez-de Diego R; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
Biomed Res Int ; 2016: 7374129, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27517046
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of techniques for soft tissue augmentation in the placement of immediate implants with and without provisionalization and to assess the quality of the reports in the literature. Randomized clinical trials, prospective clinical trials, and case series were included in this review. Clinical questions were formulated and organised according to the PICOS strategy. An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and ISI Web up until June 2016. Interexaminer agreement on eligibility (k = 0.842; p = 0.103) and quality (k = 0.933; p < 0.001) was high. Methodological approaches were assessed using criteria based on design related forms designed by the Dutch Cochrane Collaboration. Finally, 14 papers were identified. In two studies, the implant survival was 90%; for the rest of the studies it was 100%. All studies reported favourable aesthetic, biological, and radiographic outcomes. Surgical and biomechanical complications of this technique were not relevant. This technique effectively compensates for the expected loss of volume of the oral soft tissues and maintains high success rates with good aesthetic results over time.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantación Dental / Encía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Res Int Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantación Dental / Encía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Res Int Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos