Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency.
Kidwell, Mallory C; Lazarevic, Ljiljana B; Baranski, Erica; Hardwicke, Tom E; Piechowski, Sarah; Falkenberg, Lina-Sophia; Kennett, Curtis; Slowik, Agnieszka; Sonnleitner, Carina; Hess-Holden, Chelsey; Errington, Timothy M; Fiedler, Susann; Nosek, Brian A.
Afiliación
  • Kidwell MC; Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Lazarevic LB; University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Baranski E; University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.
  • Hardwicke TE; University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Piechowski S; Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.
  • Falkenberg LS; Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.
  • Kennett C; Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, United States of America.
  • Slowik A; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Sonnleitner C; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Hess-Holden C; Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, United States of America.
  • Errington TM; Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Fiedler S; Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.
  • Nosek BA; Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS Biol ; 14(5): e1002456, 2016 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27171007
Beginning January 2014, Psychological Science gave authors the opportunity to signal open data and materials if they qualified for badges that accompanied published articles. Before badges, less than 3% of Psychological Science articles reported open data. After badges, 23% reported open data, with an accelerating trend; 39% reported open data in the first half of 2015, an increase of more than an order of magnitude from baseline. There was no change over time in the low rates of data sharing among comparison journals. Moreover, reporting openness does not guarantee openness. When badges were earned, reportedly available data were more likely to be actually available, correct, usable, and complete than when badges were not earned. Open materials also increased to a weaker degree, and there was more variability among comparison journals. Badges are simple, effective signals to promote open practices and improve preservation of data and materials by using independent repositories.
Asunto(s)
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicología / Edición / Publicaciones Seriadas Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: PLoS Biol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicología / Edición / Publicaciones Seriadas Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: PLoS Biol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos