Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Women's experiences after Planned Parenthood's exclusion from a family planning program in Texas.
Woo, C Junda; Alamgir, Hasanat; Potter, Joseph E.
Afiliación
  • Woo CJ; University of Texas School of Public Health, San Antonio Regional Campus, TX, USA. Electronic address: junda.woo@sanantonio.gov.
  • Alamgir H; University of Texas School of Public Health, San Antonio Regional Campus, TX, USA.
  • Potter JE; Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
Contraception ; 93(4): 298-302, 2016 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26680757
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact on depot medroxyprogesterone continuation when a large care provider was banned from a state-funded family planning program. STUDY DESIGN: We used three methods to assess the effect of the ban: (a) In a records review, we compared how many state program participants returned to two Planned Parenthood affiliates for a scheduled dose of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) immediately after the ban; (b) We conducted phone interviews with 224 former Planned Parenthood patients about DMPA use and access to contraception immediately after the ban; (c) We compared current contraceptive method of our interviewees to that of comparable DMPA users in the National Survey of Family Growth 2006-2010 (NSFG). RESULTS: (a) Fewer program clients returned for DMPA at a large urban Planned Parenthood, compared to a remotely located affiliate (14.4%, vs. 64.8%), reflecting different levels of access to alternative providers in the two cities. (b) Among program participants who went elsewhere for the injection, only 56.8% obtained it at no cost and on time. More than one in five women missed a dose because of barriers, most commonly due to difficulty finding a provider. (c) Compared to NSFG participants, our interviewees used less effective methods of contraception, even more than a year after the ban went into effect. CONCLUSIONS: Injectable contraception use was disrupted during the rollout of the state-funded family planning program. Women living in a remote area of Texas encountered more barriers. IMPLICATIONS: Requiring low-income family planning patients to switch healthcare providers has adverse consequences.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Salud de la Mujer / Servicios de Planificación Familiar / Federación Internacional para la Paternidad Responsable Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Salud de la Mujer / Servicios de Planificación Familiar / Federación Internacional para la Paternidad Responsable Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos