Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.
van der Weiden, Anouk; Aarts, Henk; Prikken, Merel; van Haren, Neeltje E M.
Afiliación
  • van der Weiden A; Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispostnummer A.01.126, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.vanderweiden@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Aarts H; Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Prikken M; Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispostnummer A.01.126, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van Haren NE; Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispostnummer A.01.126, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Exp Brain Res ; 234(2): 499-510, 2016 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525711
Successful social interaction requires the ability to integrate as well as distinguish own and others' actions. Normally, the integration and distinction of self and other are a well-balanced process, occurring without much effort or conscious attention. However, not everyone is blessed with the ability to balance self-other distinction and integration, resulting in personal distress in reaction to other people's emotions or even a loss of self [e.g., in (subclinical) psychosis]. Previous research has demonstrated that the integration and distinction of others' actions cause interference with one's own action performance (commonly assessed with a social Simon task). The present study had two goals. First, as previous studies on the social Simon effect employed relatively small samples (N < 50 per test), we aimed for a sample size that allowed us to test the robustness of the action interference effect. Second, we tested to what extent action interference reflects individual differences in traits related to self-other distinction (i.e., personal distress in reaction to other people's emotions and subclinical psychotic symptoms). Based on a questionnaire study among a large sample (N = 745), we selected a subsample (N = 130) of participants scoring low, average, or high on subclinical psychotic symptoms, or on personal distress. The selected participants performed a social Simon task. Results showed a robust social Simon effect, regardless of individual differences in personal distress or subclinical psychotic symptoms. However, exploratory analyses revealed that the sex composition of interaction pairs modulated social Simon effects. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desempeño Psicomotor / Trastornos Psicóticos / Estrés Psicológico / Caracteres Sexuales / Conducta Cooperativa / Individualidad Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Exp Brain Res Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desempeño Psicomotor / Trastornos Psicóticos / Estrés Psicológico / Caracteres Sexuales / Conducta Cooperativa / Individualidad Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Exp Brain Res Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Alemania