Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adopting Advance Directives Reinforces Patient Participation in End-of-Life Care Discussion.
Hong, Ji Hyung; Kwon, Jung Hye; Kim, Il Kyu; Ko, Jin Hee; Kang, Yi-Jin; Kim, Hoon-Kyo.
Afiliación
  • Hong JH; Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.
  • Kwon JH; St. Vincent's Hospital Hospice Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
  • Kim IK; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym Universit Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ko JH; St. Vincent's Hospital Hospice Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
  • Kang YJ; Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
  • Kim HK; St. Vincent's Hospital Hospice Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
Cancer Res Treat ; 48(2): 753-8, 2016 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26511808
PURPOSE: In Korea, most terminal cancer patients have still not been included in end-of-life (EOL) discussions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proportion of patients participating in EOL discussions after adopting advance directives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 106 hospice patients between July 2012 and February 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. The proportion of patient participation in EOL discussions, barriers, and favorable factors for completion of advance directives, as well as outcomes of advance directives were evaluated. RESULTS: Patient participation in EOL discussion had increased from 16/53 (30%) to 27/53 (51%) since adopting advance directives (p < 0.001). Median time between completion of an advance directive and death increased from 8 days (range, 0 to 22 days) to 14.5 days (range, 0 to 47 days). Patients' poor condition after late referral was the main barrier to missing EOL discussions; however, family members' concerns about patient's distress was also a main reason for excluding the patient from EOL discussions. In univariate analysis, patient age, education status, and time from diagnosis to completion of an advance directive influenced advance directive completion favorably. Following multivariate analysis, higher education and periods of more than 2 years from diagnosis to completion of an advance directive remained favorable (odds ratio [OR], 9.586, p=0.024 and OR, 70.312; p=0.002). Preferences of all patients regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation or hemodialysis were carried out by physicians. Orders for nutrition and palliative sedation showed discordance, with concordance rates of 74.2% and 51.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that the use of advance directive promote patient participation in EOL discussion.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Cuidado Terminal / Directivas Anticipadas Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Res Treat Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Corea del Sur

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Cuidado Terminal / Directivas Anticipadas Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Res Treat Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Corea del Sur