Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical Incision and Approach in Thoracolumbar Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery: An Anatomic Study of the Diaphragmatic Attachments.
Sun, Jing-Chuan; Wang, Ji-Rong; Luo, Ting; Jin, Xian-Nan; Ma, Rui; Luo, Bei-Er; Xu, Tao; Wang, Yuan; Wang, Hai-Bo; Zhang, Bin; Liu, Xiang; Zheng, Bing; Peng, Xu; Hou, Yang; Guo, Yong-Fei; Xu, Guo-Hua; Shi, Guo-Dong; Shi, Jian-Gang.
Afiliación
  • Sun JC; *Second Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China†Student Brigade, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China‡Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 41(4): E186-90, 2016 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26352744
STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: To provide anatomical basis for deciding the surgical approach and skin incision in thoracolumbar extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) by delineating the attachment points of diaphragm. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the general anatomy of the thoracic diaphragm is well described, the specific attachment points of diaphragm concerned with the XLIF approach is yet to be elaborated. METHODS: Dissections were performed on 21 cases of formalin fixed specimens (12 males, 9 females, a total of 42 sets of data). Special attention was paid to the attachment points of diaphragm on both sides at the midaxillary line (MAL point) and the vertebral level parallel to the MAL point (VL-MAL). The attachment points of diaphragm on the front and back edge of the spinal column (FES point and BES point) were also described. RESULTS: The MAL point of diaphragm muscle lied between the inferior edge of the 10th rib and the superior edge of the 12th rib (20 out of 21 on left, 21 out of 21 on right). VL-MAL lied between L1 and L2 vertebrae level (20 out of 21 on left, 18 out of 21 on right). The attachments on both sides of the vertebral column mainly located between the upper edge of T12 vertebrae and L1-L2 disc (38 out of 42). CONCLUSION: A transthoracic approach should be considered when the target level was above T12 vertebrae, whereas a retroperitoneal approach should be chosen when target level was below L1-L2 disc. If the target level is located between T12 and L1-L2 disc, whether via transthoracic, retropleural, or retroperitoneal approach should be determined according to the conditions of patients and the skill and experience of the surgeon. Incision should be made above the 10th rib for the transthoracic approach and below the 12th rib for the retroperitoneal approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Vértebras Torácicas / Diafragma / Vértebras Lumbares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Vértebras Torácicas / Diafragma / Vértebras Lumbares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos