CONCLUSIONS: Hydrostatic positive pressure and vasoconstrictor acidified the cochlear fluids, whereas the vasodilator made the fluids alkaline. CBF might play a role in regulating cochlea fluid pH. OBJECTIVES: Cochlea fluid pH is highly dependent on the HCO3(-)/CO2 buffer system. Cochlear blood flow (CBF) supplies O2 and removes CO2. It is speculated that cochlear blood flow changes might affect the balance of the HCO3(-)/CO2 buffer system in the cochlea. It is known that the elevation of inner ear pressure decreases the CBF, and local application of vasodilating or vasoconstricting agents directly to the cochlea changes the CBF. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of positive hydrostatic inner ear pressure and application of a vasodilator and vasoconstrictor of cochlear vessels on the pH of the endolymph and perilymph. METHODS: The authors performed animal physiological experiments on 30 guinea pigs. Hydrostatic positive pressure was infused through a glass capillary tube inserted into the scala tympani of the basal turn. The vasodilator, nitric oxide donor (sodium nitroprusside; SNP), and the vasoconstrictor, bupivacaine, were placed topically onto the round window of the guinea pig cochlea. Endolymph pH (pHe) and endocochlear potential (EP) were monitored by double-barreled ion-selective microelectrodes in the second turn of the guinea pig cochlea. During the topical application study, scala vestibuli perilymph pH (pHv) was also measured simultaneously in the second turn. RESULTS: The application of hydrostatic positive pressure caused a decrease in pHe and EP. Positive perilymphatic pressure caused the endolymph to become acidic pressure-dependently. Application of 3.0% SNP evoked an increase in both the pHe and pHv, following by a gradual recovery to baseline levels. On the other hand, 0.5% bupivacaine caused a decrease in both the pHe and pHv. The EP during topical application showed slight, non-significant changes.