Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Digitation associated with defecation: what does it mean in urogynaecological patients?
Hai-Ying, Cao; Guzmán Rojas, Rodrigo; Hall, Jessica Caudwell; Atan, Ixora Kamisan; Dietz, Hans Peter.
Afiliación
  • Hai-Ying C; Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, 2750, Australia.
  • Guzmán Rojas R; GE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
  • Hall JC; Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, 2750, Australia.
  • Atan IK; Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
  • Dietz HP; Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Int Urogynecol J ; 27(2): 229-32, 2016 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26264476
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstructed defecation is a common symptom complex in urogynaecological patients, and perineal, vaginal and/or anal digitation may required for defecation. Translabial ultrasound can be used to assess anorectal anatomy, similar to defecation proctography. The aim of the present study was to determine the association between different forms of digitation (vaginal, perineal and anal) and abnormal posterior compartment anatomy. METHODS: A total of 271 patients were analysed in a retrospective study utilising archived ultrasound volume datasets. Symptoms of obstructed defecation (straining at stool, incomplete bowel emptying, perineal, vaginal and anal digitation) were ascertained on interview. Postprocessing of stored 3D/4D translabial ultrasound datasets obtained on maximal Valsalva was used to diagnose descent of the rectal ampulla, rectocoele, enterocoele and rectal intussusception at a later date, blinded to all clinical data. RESULTS: Digitation was reported by 39 % of our population. The position of the rectal ampulla on Valsalva was associated with perineal (p = 0.02) and vaginal (p = 0.02) digitation. The presence of a true rectocoele was significantly associated with perineal (p = 0.04) and anal (p = 0.03) digitation. Rectocoele depth was associated with all three forms of digitation (P = 0.005-0.02). The bother of symptoms of obstructed defecation was strongly associated with digitation (all P < = 0.001), with no appreciable difference in bother among the three forms. CONCLUSION: Digitation is common, and all forms of digitation are associated with abnormal posterior compartment anatomy. It may not be necessary to distinguish between different forms of digitation in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Recto / Estreñimiento / Rectocele / Defecación / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Intususcepción Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Recto / Estreñimiento / Rectocele / Defecación / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Intususcepción Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido