Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The enduring effects of psychodynamic treatments vis-à-vis alternative treatments: A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis.
Kivlighan, D Martin; Goldberg, Simon B; Abbas, Maleeha; Pace, Brian T; Yulish, Noah E; Thomas, Joel G; Cullen, Megan M; Flückiger, Christoph; Wampold, Bruce E.
Afiliación
  • Kivlighan DM; University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States. Electronic address: kivlighan@wisc.edu.
  • Goldberg SB; University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.
  • Abbas M; University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.
  • Pace BT; University of Utah, United States.
  • Yulish NE; University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.
  • Thomas JG; Universtiy of Illinois, United States.
  • Cullen MM; University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.
  • Flückiger C; University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Wampold BE; University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States; Modum Bad Psychiatric Center, Vikersund, Norway.
Clin Psychol Rev ; 40: 1-14, 2015 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26042927
Although evidence suggests that the benefits of psychodynamic treatments are sustained over time, presently it is unclear whether these sustained benefits are superior to non-psychodynamic treatments. Additionally, the extant literature comparing the sustained benefits of psychodynamic treatments compared to alternative treatments is limited with methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a rigorous test of the growth of the benefits of psychodynamic treatments relative to alternative treatments across distinct domains of change (i.e., all outcome measures, targeted outcome measures, non-targeted outcome measures, and personality outcome measures). To do so, the study employed strict inclusion criteria to identify randomized clinical trials that directly compared at least one bona fide psychodynamic treatment and one bona fide non-psychodynamic treatment. Hierarchical linear modeling (Raudenbush, Bryk, Cheong, Congdon, & du Toit, 2011) was used to longitudinally model the impact of psychodynamic treatments compared to non-psychodynamic treatments at post-treatment and to compare the growth (i.e., slope) of effects beyond treatment completion. Findings from the present meta-analysis indicated that psychodynamic treatments and non-psychodynamic treatments were equally efficacious at post-treatment and at follow-up for combined outcomes (k=20), targeted outcomes (k=19), non-targeted outcomes (k=17), and personality outcomes (k=6). Clinical implications, directions for future research, and limitations are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicoterapia / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Psicoterapia Psicodinámica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Psychol Rev Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicoterapia / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Psicoterapia Psicodinámica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Psychol Rev Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos