Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Turkish critical care nurses' views on end-of-life decision making and practices.
Badir, Aysel; Topçu, Ibrahim; Türkmen, Emine; Göktepe, Nilgün; Miral, Mukaddes; Ersoy, Nermin; Akin, Esra.
Afiliación
  • Badir A; Koc University School of Nursing, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Topçu I; Bezmialem Foundation University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Türkmen E; Koc University School of Nursing, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Göktepe N; Koc University School of Nursing, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Miral M; Department of Education & Human Resources, Health Directorate of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ersoy N; Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Akin E; Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Health Sciences Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Nurs Crit Care ; 21(6): 334-342, 2016 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25943254
BACKGROUND: Life-sustaining treatments are increasingly used in intensive care units (ICUs) for EOL care, but the decision to use these may cause ethical issues. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the views and practices of critical care nurses in Turkey on the end-of-life (EOL) care. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. METHODS: The research was conducted in 32 second- and third-level ICUs of 19 Ministry of Health research hospitals in Turkey. The Views of European Nurses in Intensive Care on EOL Care tool was used for data collection. RESULTS: The total sample size was 602. While half of the nurses stated that the withholding and withdrawal of life support were ethically different decisions, 40% felt both decisions were unethical. The expected quality of life as viewed by the patient, the medical team, the family and the nursing team (90·4%, 85·4%, and 83·4%, respectively) was an important factor in EOL decision making. The majority of the nurses (75·7%) were not directly involved in the EOL decision making and 78·4% of nurses were committed to family involvement in EOL decisions. When withdrawing treatment, 87·2% of ICU nurses agreed that the patient and family members should perform their final religious and spiritual duties. Further results showed that after withdrawing treatment, a majority of nurses (86%) agreed to continue pressure sore prevention, effective pain relief (85·5%), nutritional support (77·6%) and hydration (64·8%). Almost half (48·2%) indicated that keeping the patients in the ICU was unnecessary. CONCLUSION: ICU nurses expressed a range of experiences and practices regarding EOL care. ICU nurses should be more involved in the decision-making process about EOL care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Due to their unique relationship with patients, nurses should be involved in EOL care decision making; however, patients, families or nurses are not often involved in the decision-making process in Turkey.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Nurs Crit Care Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Nurs Crit Care Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Reino Unido