Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of two cephalometric analyses in the treatment of patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Dantas, João Frank Carvalho; Carvalho, Sergio Henrique Gonçalves de; Oliveira, Luciana Soares de Andrade Freitas; Barbosa, Danilo Batista Martins; de Souza, Raphael Freitas; Sarmento, Viviane Almeida.
Afiliación
  • Dantas JF; Dep. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, PortugueseHospital, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  • Carvalho SH; Dep. of Propaedeutics, Dental School of Araruna, UEPB - State University of Paraíba, Araruna, PB, Brazil.
  • Oliveira LS; Dep. of Applied Sciences, IFBA - Federal Institute of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  • Barbosa DB; Dep. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School of João Pessoa, UFPB - Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
  • de Souza RF; Dep. of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, USP - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
  • Sarmento VA; Dep. of Propaedeutics and Integrated Clinic, Dental School, UFBA - Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Braz Dent J ; 26(2): 186-92, 2015.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25831112
The aim of the present study was to compare the treatment plan outlined from the diagnosis obtained by two different cephalometric analyses with the clinical decision made for surgical treatment of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. For this purpose, 82 skeletal Class III patients were evaluated, divided into three groups according to the surgical procedure performed for dentofacial deformity correction. Their preoperative cephalometric radiographs were submitted to McNamara and Steiner cephalometric analyses. The association of variables was evaluated by Kappa correlation (α=5%). The agreement between indication of surgical procedures performed based on clinical decision and surgical treatment indicated based on the evaluation of McNamara and Steiner cephalometric analyses were not significant (p=0.609 and p=0.544, respectively). McNamara and Steiner analyses showed reasonable agreement with each other as to the diagnosis, but did not agree with the clinical decision to treat skeletal CIII patients. Both tests were equally inaccurate in the indication of the surgical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cefalometría / Maloclusión de Angle Clase III Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Braz Dent J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Brasil
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cefalometría / Maloclusión de Angle Clase III Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Braz Dent J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Brasil