Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of dose calculation algorithms for static and rotational IMRT of lung cancer: A phantom study.
Sini, Carla; Broggi, Sara; Fiorino, Claudio; Cattaneo, Giovanni Mauro; Calandrino, Riccardo.
Afiliación
  • Sini C; Medical Physics Department, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
  • Broggi S; Medical Physics Department, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: broggi.sara@hsr.it.
  • Fiorino C; Medical Physics Department, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
  • Cattaneo GM; Medical Physics Department, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
  • Calandrino R; Medical Physics Department, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Phys Med ; 31(4): 382-90, 2015 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25801284
PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of Pencil beam (PB), Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition (CCCS) in thoracic tumours for various IMRT techniques. METHODS: Step-and-shoot Linac IMRT (IMRT), arc volumetric RapidArc (RA) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT) lung treatments for different clinical situations (mediastinum tumour, single metastasis and multiple metastases) were simulated and calculated with PB/AAA, AAA, CCCS, respectively. Delivery quality assurance plans were first verified in homogeneous media (Cheese phantom and ArcCHECK); then several low-density inhomogeneous phantoms were used: the Multiplug ArcCHECK, the commercial ArcCHECK slightly modified with a low density lung-shape insert and a custom-made slab heterogeneous phantom simulating the thorax region. Absolute doses and planar dose maps were checked to assess the agreement between measured and calculated dose distributions. RESULTS: In total, data referred to 195 point dose measurements and 189 planar measurements were considered. Average point absolute deviations <3% were found for all the delivery techniques/dose algorithms. In small targets completely embedded in very low density media, deviations up to 7-10% and 4-5% were found for PB and AAA/CCCS respectively. Excellent results were found for planar measurements in ArcCHECK configurations, where ≥ 95% of points satisfy the 3%/3 mm acceptance criteria for all the algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: A satisfactory agreement (<2%) between planned and measured doses was generally found for CCCS and AAA, excepting the very critical situation of a small tumour completely embedded in air. A significant dose overestimation (from few to 5-7%) was confirmed for PB in complex inhomogeneous arrangements.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiometría / Rotación / Algoritmos / Fantasmas de Imagen / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiometría / Rotación / Algoritmos / Fantasmas de Imagen / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Italia