Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk/Benefit Communication about Food-A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Frewer, L J; Fischer, A R H; Brennan, M; Bánáti, D; Lion, R; Meertens, R M; Rowe, G; Siegrist, M; Verbeke, W; Vereijken, C M J L.
Afiliación
  • Frewer LJ; a Food and Society Group, Centre for Rural Economy, SAFRD , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , United Kingdom.
  • Fischer AR; b Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group , Wageningen University , The Netherlands.
  • Brennan M; a Food and Society Group, Centre for Rural Economy, SAFRD , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , United Kingdom.
  • Bánáti D; c International Life Sciences Institute , Europe , Brussels , Belgium.
  • Lion R; d Unilever R&D Vlaardingen , Vlaardingen , The Netherlands.
  • Meertens RM; e Department of Health Promotion, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM) and Care and Public Health Research Institute (Caphri) , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
  • Rowe G; f Gene Rowe Evaluations , Norwich , United Kingdom.
  • Siegrist M; g Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED) , Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland.
  • Verbeke W; h Department of Agricultural Economics , Ghent University , Gent , Belgium.
  • Vereijken CM; i Danone Research-Centre for Specialised Nutrition , Wageningen , The Netherlands.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 56(10): 1728-45, 2016 Jul 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25575335
A systematic review relevant to the following research questions was conducted (1) the extent to which different theoretical frameworks have been applied to food risk/benefit communication and (2) the impact such food risk/benefit communication interventions have had on related risk/benefit attitudes and behaviors. Fifty four papers were identified. The analysis revealed that (primarily European or US) research interest has been relatively recent. Certain food issues were of greater interest to researchers than others, perhaps reflecting the occurrence of a crisis, or policy concern. Three broad themes relevant to the development of best practice in risk (benefit) communication were identified: the characteristics of the target population; the contents of the information; and the characteristics of the information sources. Within these themes, independent and dependent variables differed considerably. Overall, acute risk (benefit) communication will require advances in communication process whereas chronic communication needs to identify audience requirements. Both citizen's risk/benefit perceptions and (if relevant) related behaviors need to be taken into account, and recommendations for behavioral change need to be concrete and actionable. The application of theoretical frameworks to the study of risk (benefit) communication was infrequent, and developing predictive models of effective risk (benefit) communication may be contingent on improved theoretical perspectives.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comunicación Persuasiva / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Inocuidad de los Alimentos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comunicación Persuasiva / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Inocuidad de los Alimentos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos