Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography accuracy in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer: review and cost-effectiveness.
Gómez León, Nieves; Escalona, Sofía; Bandrés, Beatriz; Belda, Cristobal; Callejo, Daniel; Blasco, Juan Antonio.
Afiliación
  • Gómez León N; Department of Radiology, Research Institute La Princesa, La Princesa University Hospital, C/Diego de León 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
  • Escalona S; Health Technology Assessment Unit, Lain Entralgo Agency, C/Gran Vía 27, 28013 Madrid, Spain.
  • Bandrés B; Department of Radiology, Research Institute La Princesa, La Princesa University Hospital, C/Diego de León 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
  • Belda C; National School of Health, Sinesio Delgado 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
  • Callejo D; Health Technology Assessment Unit, Lain Entralgo Agency, C/Gran Vía 27, 28013 Madrid, Spain.
  • Blasco JA; Health Technology Assessment Unit, Lain Entralgo Agency, C/Gran Vía 27, 28013 Madrid, Spain ; Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Radiol Res Pract ; 2014: 135934, 2014.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25431665
Aim of the performed clinical study was to compare the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of PET/CT in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Material and Methods. Cross-sectional and prospective study including 103 patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC. All patients were examined using PET/CT with intravenous contrast medium. Those with disease stage ≤IIB underwent surgery (n = 40). Disease stage was confirmed based on histology results, which were compared with those of PET/CT and positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) separately. 63 patients classified with ≥IIIA disease stage by PET/CT did not undergo surgery. The cost-effectiveness of PET/CT for disease classification was examined using a decision tree analysis. Results. Compared with histology, the accuracy of PET/CT for disease staging has a positive predictive value of 80%, a negative predictive value of 95%, a sensitivity of 94%, and a specificity of 82%. For PET alone, these values are 53%, 66%, 60%, and 50%, whereas for CT alone they are 68%, 86%, 76%, and 72%, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness of PET/CT over CT alone was €17,412 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Conclusion. In our clinical study, PET/CT using intravenous contrast medium was an accurate and cost-effective method for staging of patients with NSCLC.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Res Pract Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Egipto

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Res Pract Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Egipto