Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in regional diagnostic strategies and in intended versus actual first-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer in Denmark.
Fagö-Olsen, Carsten Lindberg; Ottesen, Bent; Kehlet, Henrik; Antonsen, Sofie Leisby; Christensen, Ib Jarle; Markauskas, Algirdas; Mosgaard, Berit Jul; Ottosen, Christian; Sogaard, Charlotte Hasselholt; Hoegdall, Claus.
Afiliación
  • Fagö-Olsen CL; *Department of Gynecology, †Section of Surgical Pathophysiology; ‡The Finsen Laboratory and Biotech Research and Innovation Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen; §Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense; ∥Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen; and ¶Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 24(7): 1195-205, 2014 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25101855
BACKGROUND: Triage of patients with ovarian cancer to primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is challenging. In Denmark, the use of NACT has increased, but substantial differences in the use of NACT or PDS exist among centers. We aimed to characterize the differences between intended and actual first-line treatments in addition to the differences in the triage process among the centers and to evaluate the different diagnostic modalities and the clinical aspects' influence in the triage process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 4 centers, forms containing data about the diagnostic process and intended treatment were prospectively collected and merged with data from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and medical records. RESULTS: Of the 671 completed forms, 540 patients had stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Of the 238 (44%) referred to PDS, 91% received PDS and 4% never had debulking surgery. Of the 288 patients (53%) referred to NACT, 44% were never debulked. Fourteen patients (3%) were referred to palliative treatment. The use of different imaging modalities, diagnostic laparoscopy, and laparotomy varied significantly among the centers. Diagnostic surgical procedures were considered to be most influential in the triage process. Regardless of the intended first-line treatment or center, the tumor size and dissemination was the most influential clinical aspect. CONCLUSIONS: In Denmark, substantial differences exist between intended and actual first-line treatments as well as in the diagnostic process and use of NACT, calling for further discussion on diagnostic strategy and therapeutically approach for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Intención / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Obstétrico y Ginecológico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynecol Cancer Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Intención / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Obstétrico y Ginecológico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynecol Cancer Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca Pais de publicación: Reino Unido