Evaluation of two commercially available rapid diagnostic tests for Lyme borreliosis.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
; 34(1): 109-113, 2015 Jan.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-25073771
The diagnosis of Lyme disease is very complicated and a single diagnostic method cannot exclude infection. We assessed the performance of two commercially available Borrelia burgdorferi rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) in comparison to multiple laboratory-based diagnostic assays using specimens with a gradually increasing probability of Borrelia infection. Based on 200 specimens, the analytical sensitivities for IgG and IgM were 18 and 23% for the Lyme RDT and 24 and 32% for the Borreliose Complete RDT. The sensitivity for detecting diagnosed Lyme borreliosis cases was low (26% Lyme RDT and 32% with the Borreliose Complete RDT respectively), whereas the specificity was good (85% Lyme RDT and 88% Borreliose Complete). Based on this evaluation, the performance of RDTs in detecting Lyme borreliosis appeared to be below that of laboratory-based diagnostics.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Enfermedad de Lyme
/
Borrelia burgdorferi
/
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Evaluation_studies
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Asunto de la revista:
DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS
/
MICROBIOLOGIA
Año:
2015
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Suecia
Pais de publicación:
Alemania