Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Donor rejection before living donor liver transplantation: causes and cost effective analysis in an egyptian transplant center.
El-Meteini, Mahmoud; Dabbous, Hany; Sakr, Mohammad; Ibrahim, Amany; Fawzy, Iman; Bahaa, Mohamed; Abdelaal, Amr; Fathy, Mohamed; Said, Hany; Rady, Mohamed; El-Dorry, Ahmed.
Afiliación
  • El-Meteini M; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Dabbous H; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Sakr M; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Ibrahim A; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Fawzy I; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Bahaa M; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Abdelaal A; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Fathy M; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Said H; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Rady M; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
  • El-Dorry A; Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplant (ASCOT), Cairo, Egypt.
Hepat Mon ; 14(1): e13703, 2014 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24497879
BACKGROUND: In the living donor liver transplant setting, the preoperative assessment of potential donors is important to ensure the donor safety. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify causes and costs of living liver-donors rejection in the donation process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2010 to June 2012, all potential living liver donors for 66 liver transplant candidates were screened at the Ain Shams Center for Organ Transplantation. Potential donors were evaluated in 3 phases, and their data were reviewed to determine the causes and at which phase the donors were rejected. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety two potential living liver donors, including 157 (81.7%) males, were screened for 66 potential recipients. Of these, 126 (65.6%) were disqualified for the donation. The causes of rejection were classified as surgical (9.5 %) or medical (90.5 %). Five donors (3.9 %) were rejected due to multiple causes. Factor V Leiden mutation was detected in 29 (23 %) rejected donors (P = 0.001), 25 (19.8 %) donors had positive results for hepatitis serology (P = 0.005), and 16 (12.7 %) tested positive for drug abuse. Portal vein trifurcation (n = 9, 7.1%) and small size liver graft estimated by CT volumetric analysis (n = 6, 4.8 %) were the main surgical causes which precluded the donation. CONCLUSIONS: Among potential Egyptian living liver donors, Factor V Leiden mutation was a significant cause for live donor rejection. A stepwise approach to donor assessment was found to be cost-effective.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Hepat Mon Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Egipto Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Hepat Mon Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Egipto Pais de publicación: Países Bajos