Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 43(9): 753-84, 2013 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24040995
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft IRIS Assessment of Formaldehyde proposed a "roadmap" for reform and improvement of the Agency's risk assessment process. Specifically, it called for development of a transparent and defensible methodology for weight-of-evidence (WoE) assessments. To facilitate development of an improved process, we developed a white paper that reviewed approximately 50 existing WoE frameworks, seeking insights from their variations and nominating best practices for WoE analyses of causation of chemical risks. Four phases of WoE analysis were identified and evaluated in each framework: (1) defining the causal question and developing criteria for study selection, (2) developing and applying criteria for review of individual studies, (3) evaluating and integrating evidence and (4) drawing conclusions based on inferences. We circulated the draft white paper to stakeholders and then held a facilitated, multi-disciplinary invited stakeholder workshop to broaden and deepen the discussion on methods, rationales, utility and limitations among the surveyed WoE frameworks. The workshop developed recommendations for improving the conduct of WoE evaluations. Based on the analysis of the 50 frameworks and discussions at the workshop, best practices in conducting WoE analyses were identified for each of the four phases. Many of these best practices noted from the analysis and workshop could be implemented immediately, while others may require additional refinement as part of the ongoing discussions for improving the scientific basis of chemical risk assessments.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medición de Riesgo / Ecotoxicología Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Toxicol Asunto de la revista: TOXICOLOGIA Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medición de Riesgo / Ecotoxicología Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Toxicol Asunto de la revista: TOXICOLOGIA Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido