STUDY DESIGN: Expansive pedicle screw (EPS) and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) were inserted in sheep vertebrae in vitro and were evaluated by performing biomechanical tests, radiographic examinations and histological observations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the biomechanical and interfacial performances of EPS and PMMA-PS in sheep lumbar vertebrae in vitro. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is a great challenge for orthopedic surgeons performing transpedicular fixation in the osteoporotic spine. It was reported that either the EPS or PMMA-PS could increase the screw stability. However, there are no studies comparing the 2 kinds of screws especially in primary spinal instrumentation. METHODS: A total of 60 sheep lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into 3 groups. A pilot hole was made in advance in all samples using the same method. Thereafter, the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) was inserted directly into the pilot hole in the CPS group; the hole in PMMA-PS group was first filled with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA; 1.0 mL) and then inserted with CPS; and the EPS was inserted directly into the vertebrae in EPS group. After a period of 24 hours, biomechanical tests were performed to evaluate screw stability, and x-ray examination, micro-computerized tomography analysis, and histologic observation were performed to evaluate the interface between screw and bone. RESULTS: Compared with the stability of CPS, those of EPS and PMMA-PS were significantly enhanced. However, no significant differences were detected between the stabilities of EPS and PMMA-PS. The PMMA surrounding the screw blocked direct contact between bone and screw and formed a "screw-PMMA-bone" interface in the PMMA-PS group. There was a "screw-bone" interface in both CPS and EPS groups. Nevertheless, the expanded anterior part of EPS formed a claw-like structure pressing the surrounding bone trabeculae, which made the local bone tissue more compacted and denser than that in the CPS group. CONCLUSIONS: EPS can enhance the screw stability as markedly as the traditional PMMA-PS in primary surgery, and EPS can form a better immediate interface between screw and bone compared with PMMA-PS. EPS also can effectively avoid thermal injury, leakage, and compression caused by PMMA. A great feasibility was proved in this study to perform comparisons between the 2 kinds of pedicle screws in osteoporotic sheep vertebrae in vivo in the further research. In conclusion, we propose that EPS has a great application potential in augmentation of screw stability in the clinic.