Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Role of fecal Clostridium difficile load in discrepancies between toxin tests and PCR: is quantitation the next step in C. difficile testing?
Leslie, J L; Cohen, S H; Solnick, J V; Polage, C R.
Afiliación
  • Leslie JL; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 31(12): 3295-9, 2012 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22814877
Direct tests for Clostridium difficile are 30-50 % more sensitive than tests for C. difficile toxins but the reasons for this discrepancy are incompletely understood. In addition to toxin degradation and strain differences, we hypothesized that C. difficile concentration could be important in determining whether toxins are detected in fecal samples. We performed standard curves on an FDA-approved real-time PCR test for the C. difficile tcdB gene (Xpert C. difficile/Epi, Cepheid) during a prospective comparison of a toxin immunoassay (Meridian Premier), PCR and toxigenic culture. Immunoassay-negative, PCR-positive samples were retested with a cell cytotoxin assay (TechLab). Among 107 PCR-positive samples, 46 (43.0 %) had toxins detected by immunoassay and an additional 18 (16.8 %) had toxin detected by the cytotoxin assay yielding 64 (59.8 %) toxin-positive and 43 (40.2 %) toxin-negative samples. Overall, toxin-negative samples with C. difficile had 10(1)-10(4) fewer DNA copies than toxin-positive samples and most discrepancies between toxin tests and PCR were associated with a significant difference in C. difficile quantity. Of the toxin-positive samples, 95 % had ≥ 4.1 log(10) C. difficile tcdB DNA copies/mL; 52 % of immunoassay-negative samples and 70 % of immunoassay and cytotoxin negative samples had <4.1 log(10) C. difficile tcdB DNA copies/mL. These findings suggest that fecal C. difficile concentration is a major determinant of toxin detection and C. difficile quantitation may add to the diagnostic value of existing test methods. Future studies are needed to validate the utility of quantitation and determine the significance of low concentrations of C. difficile in the absence of detectable toxin.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toxinas Bacterianas / Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium / Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico / Heces Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toxinas Bacterianas / Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium / Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico / Heces Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania