Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Peripheral vertigo classification of the Otoneurology Committee of the Spanish Otorhinolaryngology Society: diagnostic agreement and update (version 2-2011)]. / Clasificación de los vértigos periféricos de la Comisión de Otoneurología de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología: concordancia diagnóstica y actualización (versión 2, año 2011).
Soto-Varela, Andrés; Arán-González, Ismael; López-Escámez, José Antonio; Morera-Pérez, Constantino; Oliva-Domínguez, Manuel; Pérez-Fernández, Nicolás; Pérez-Garrigues, Herminio; Pérez-Vázquez, Paz; Rossi-Izquierdo, Marcos; Santos-Pérez, Sofía.
Afiliación
  • Soto-Varela A; Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España. andres.soto@usc.es
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp ; 63(2): 125-31, 2012.
Article en Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22169589
INTRODUCTION: In 2008, the Otoneurology committee of the SEORL-PCF published a classification of peripheral vertigo, based on clinical criteria. The objective of this study was to validate this classification through analysing the diagnostic agreement among several medical assessors. METHODS: Seven medical assessors, all with clinical experience, from 6 different hospitals, participated in the study. One of them selected the clinical histories of 50 consecutive patients who had consulted as a result of balance disorders (24 men and 26 women) with an average age of 53.5 years. These clinical histories -without any information that would identify the patient, the diagnosis established and the treatment- were sent to another 6 assessors. Each of these investigators established their own diagnosis, trying to adjust it to the epigraphs of the classification. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, there was substantial agreement as to the diagnosis (4 or more evaluators indicated the same one) in 31 cases (26 with a positive diagnosis and 5 with a negative one, which could not be included in any epigraph). The kappa index, which measures the level of accordance between 2 or more assessors, was 0.4198 (moderate level of agreement). Unanimity was achieved in only 7 cases (4 BPPV, 2 Ménière's disease and 1 vertigo associated with migraine). CONCLUSIONS: The current classification, with the criteria it includes, allows labelling with an acceptable consensus to only 62% of the patients. Therefore, a modification in the classification is proposed in relation with the probable BPPV epigraph, as well a revision of the entries for vertigo-migraine and vertigo associated with migraine.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Variaciones Dependientes del Observador / Vértigo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: Es Revista: Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Variaciones Dependientes del Observador / Vértigo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: Es Revista: Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España