Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A guide to interpreting contraceptive efficacy studies.
Trussell, J; Hatcher, R A; Cates, W; Stewart, F H; Kost, K.
Afiliación
  • Trussell J; Office of Population Research, Princeton University, New Jersey.
Obstet Gynecol ; 76(3 Pt 2): 558-67, 1990 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2199875
Results of trials of various birth control methods and contraceptive products may provide misleading data and engender unrealistic expectations regarding efficacy. An analysis of published efficacy-trials reveals numerous fallacies in their design, performance, and reporting. Consequently, family planning clinicians find it virtually impossible to make valid comparisons among the methods or products. This article reviews the definitions and measures that have been used to assess contraceptive efficacy, describes and illustrates some of the flaws that confound interpretation and comparison of studies, and presents a set of recommendations for future studies. A summary table providing comparative failure rates for all methods of contraception is included.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anticonceptivos / Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Obstet Gynecol Año: 1990 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anticonceptivos / Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Obstet Gynecol Año: 1990 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos