Evaluation of email alerts in practice: Part 2. Validation of the information assessment method.
J Eval Clin Pract
; 16(6): 1236-43, 2010 Dec.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-20722882
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The information assessment method (IAM) permits health professionals to systematically document the relevance, cognitive impact, use and health outcomes of information objects delivered by or retrieved from electronic knowledge resources. The companion review paper (Part 1) critically examined the literature, and proposed a 'Push-Pull-Acquisition-Cognition-Application' evaluation framework, which is operationalized by IAM. The purpose of the present paper (Part 2) is to examine the content validity of the IAM cognitive checklist when linked to email alerts. METHODS: A qualitative component of a mixed methods study was conducted with 46 doctors reading and rating research-based synopses sent on email. The unit of analysis was a doctor's explanation of a rating of one item regarding one synopsis. Interviews with participants provided 253 units that were analysed to assess concordance with item definitions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The content relevance of seven items was supported. For three items, revisions were needed. Interviews suggested one new item. This study has yielded a 2008 version of IAM.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Médicos
/
Correo Electrónico
/
Educación Médica Continua
/
Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Evaluation_studies
/
Qualitative_research
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Región como asunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Eval Clin Pract
Asunto de la revista:
PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE
Año:
2010
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Canadá
Pais de publicación:
Reino Unido