Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.
Jensch, Sebastiaan; Bipat, Shandra; Peringa, Jan; de Vries, Ayso H; Heutinck, Anneke; Dekker, Evelien; Baak, Lubbertus C; Montauban van Swijndregt, Alexander D; Stoker, Jaap.
Afiliación
  • Jensch S; Department of Radiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.jensch@amc.uva.nl
Eur Radiol ; 20(1): 146-56, 2010 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19626326
The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare participant experience and preference of limited preparation computed tomography colonography (CTC) with full-preparation colonoscopy in a consecutive series of patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer. CTC preparation comprised 180 ml diatrizoate meglumine, 80 ml barium and 30 mg bisacodyl. For the colonoscopy preparation 4 l of polyethylene glycol solution was used. Participants' experience and preference were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the chi-squared test, respectively. Associations between preference and experience parameters for the 173 participants were determined by logistic regression. Diarrhoea occurred in 94% of participants during CTC preparation. This side effect was perceived as severely or extremely burdensome by 29%. Nonetheless, the total burden was significantly lower for the CTC preparation than for colonoscopy (9% rated the CTC preparation as severely or extremely burdensome compared with 59% for colonoscopy; p < 0.001). Participants experienced significantly more pain, discomfort and total burden with the colonoscopy procedure than with CTC (p < 0.001). After 5 weeks, 69% preferred CTC, 8% were indifferent and 23% preferred colonoscopy (p < 0.001). A burdensome colonoscopy preparation and pain at colonoscopy were associated with CTC preference (p < 0.04). In conclusion, participants' experience and preference were rated in favour of CTC with limited bowel preparation compared with full-preparation colonoscopy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Catárticos / Colonoscopía / Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Catárticos / Colonoscopía / Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Alemania