AIM: To compare the results of open and laparoscopic appendectomy and to determine if the laparoscopic approach might be more effective for some subgroups of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the computerised data of 326 consecutive adult patients operated on for suspected appendicitis between 2001 and 2005. The series consisted of 166 men and 160 women with a mean age of 32 +/- 16 years and a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 24 +/- 4. There were 265 ASA I, 46 ASA II and 5 ASA III patients. According to the surgeon's preference, 176 patients had an open appendectomy (OA) and 150 a laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). RESULTS: The mean operative time and hospital stay were equivalent in the two groups : respectively 49 +/- 19 min. and 4.1 +/- 2.5 days in OA and 50 +/- 16 min. and 3.5 +/- 1.8 days in LA. However, subgroup analysis revealed that overweight (BMI > 25) patients (n = 102) and patients with ectopic appendices (n = 86) had an obvious benefit from LA. In cases of OA, operative time and hospital stay were longer in overweight patients than in normal weight patients: respectively 63 +/- 20 min. and 5.3 +/- 2.9 days versus 44 +/- 16 min. (p < 0.01) and 3.7 +/- 2.2 days (p < 0.01). On the contrary, no difference was observed in the LA group. Operative time and hospital stay were also longer in patients with ectopic appendices submitted to OA than in patients with an appendix in the normal position: respectively 60 +/- 18 min. and 4.7 +/- 2.7 days versus 45 +/- 18 min. (p < 0.01) and 3.9 +/- 2.4 days (p < 0.01). Again, such a difference was not observed in cases of LA. We noted no mortality, but 24 patients (7%) developed an abdominal complication : 18 wound infections and 6 intra-abdominal abscesses. Wound infections were more common in the OA than in the LA group : 7.3% (13/176) versus 3.3% (5/150) (p = 0.1). In the LA group, 4 wound infections were observed in our early experience, at a time where no endoscopic bag was used for the removal of the appendix. The rate of intra-abdominal abscesses was similar: 1.7% (3/176) in the OA group and 2% (3/150) in the LA group. CONCLUSIONS: LA is an effective procedure with a reduced risk of developing wound infection. The laparoscopic approach is particularly effective for overweight patients and/or patients with ectopic appendices as far as shortening the operative time and hospital stay is concerned.