Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Operation for primary hyperparathyroidism: the new versus the old order. A randomised controlled trial of preoperative localisation.
Aarum, S; Nordenström, J; Reihnér, E; Zedenius, J; Jacobsson, H; Danielsson, R; Bäckdahl, M; Lindholm, H; Wallin, G; Hamberger, B; Farnebo, L O.
Afiliación
  • Aarum S; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Surg ; 96(1): 26-30, 2007.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17461308
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), parathyroid imaging is nowadays routinely used for the purpose to perform a focused unilateral minimally invasive operation. The outcome of this new strategy has, however, not been established in randomised trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomised to either preoperative localisation with sestamibi scintigraphy and ultrasonography (group I) or no preoperative localisation (group II). In group I, a minimally invasive parathyroidectomy was performed in patients in whom both localisation studies were consistent with a single pathological gland, whereas a conventional bilateral neck exploration was performed in cases with negative localisation findings. In group II all patients underwent conventional bilateral neck exploration. Primary outcome measure was normocalcaemia at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In the preoperative localisation group (group I) 23/50 (46%) of the patients could be operated on with the focused operation whereas 26/50 (52%) were operated on by bilateral neck exploration. All patients in the no localisation group (group II; n = 50) were operated on with the intended bilateral neck operation. Normocalcaemia was obtained in 96% and 94% in group I and II, respectively. Total (localisation and operative) costs were 21% higher in group I. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative localisation, with the intention to perform minimally invasive parathyroidectomy, is not cost effective if concordant results of scintigraphy and ultrasonography are a prerequisite for the focused operation. Less than half of the patients were successfully managed with this strategy, at a higher cost and without obtaining a more favourable clinical outcome.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Paratiroidectomía / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos / Hiperparatiroidismo Primario Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Surg Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Paratiroidectomía / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos / Hiperparatiroidismo Primario Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Surg Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido