Peer review interrater concordance of scientific abstracts: a study of anesthesiology subspecialty and component societies.

Cohen, Ira Todd; Patel, Kantilal

Cohen, Ira Todd; Patel, Kantilal.

Afiliación

Cohen IT; Department of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20010, USA. icohen@cnmc.org

Anesth Analg ; 102(5): 1501-3, 2006 May.

Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16632833

RESUMEN

Abstracts presented at anesthesiology subspeciality and component society meetings are chosen by peer review. We assessed this process by examining selection criteria and determining interrater concordance. For the societies studied, the level of reviewer agreement ranged from poor to moderate, i.e., slightly better than by chance alone. We hypothesize that having clearer evaluation criteria, scoring systems with interval scales, and assessment based on quality can strengthen the peer review process.

Asunto(s)

Anestesiología/métodos; Revisión por Pares/métodos; Sociedades Médicas; Análisis de Varianza; Humanos

Buscar en Google

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Revisión por Pares / Sociedades Médicas / Anestesiología Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Buscar en Google

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links