Embryo transfer to the uterus or the fallopian tube after in vitro fertilization yields similar results.

Toth, T L; Oehninger, S; Toner, J P; Brzyski, R G; Acosta, A A; Muasher, S J

Toth, T L; Oehninger, S; Toner, J P; Brzyski, R G; Acosta, A A; Muasher, S J.

Afiliación

Toth TL; Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk 23507.

Fertil Steril ; 57(5): 1110-3, 1992 May.

Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1572482

RESUMEN

The outcome of ZIFT and IVF-ET was compared in consecutive nontubal factor patients in a prospective fashion. Groups did not differ in characteristics and were matched by the number of prezygotes/pre-embryos transferred. Overall, implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and ongoing PRs were not statistically different. These results suggest that ZIFT offers no significant advantage over IVF-ET for the treatment of nontubal infertility.

Asunto(s)

Transferencia de Embrión/métodos; Trompas Uterinas; Fertilización In Vitro; Útero; Adulto; Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto; Femenino; Transferencia Intrafalopiana del Gameto; Humanos; Infertilidad Femenina/terapia; Cigoto

Buscar en Google

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Útero / Fertilización In Vitro / Transferencia de Embrión / Trompas Uterinas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Fertil Steril Año: 1992 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Buscar en Google

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links